Manual Testing versus Automated Testing

[article]

focus on eliminating the test team, they focus on doing a more effective and efficient job of testing with the resources they already have.

And Context Matters, Too
The last two articles have run the risk of making you think that all the matters is testing prowess, picking the right techniques and tools. But that's not true. Context matters. When do we start testing? Who does the testing, and what makes them a fit? Does the test team understand where they fit into the project, and vice versa? In the next article, we'll look at the importance of context through a topic I call pervasive testing.

Bibliography
R. Black and G. Kubaczkowski, "Mission Made Possible," Software Testing and Quality Engineering magazine, Volume 4, Number 4.
C. Jones, Estimating Software Costs . McGraw-Hill, 1995.
C. Kaner, J. Bach, and B. Pettichord, Lessons Learned in Software Testing . Wiley, 2001.
D. Graham and M. Fewster, Software Test Automation . Addison-Wesley, 1999.

About the author

AgileConnection is one of the growing communities of the TechWell network.

Featuring fresh, insightful stories, TechWell.com is the place to go for what is happening in software development and delivery.  Join the conversation now!